What happened to SV?

[Shirozakii]

Before I get infracted/burned/skinned and then infracted again. Can someone tell us what happened to SV? Is the bug exploit over as in 9net9com fixing their part or TQ's fault. And how can it be fixed if at all? I mean, you don't make the same bug twice right?

ANd while we're at it, what is happening with cotobo? I never used it, but everyone claims its awesome.

And Venom, is it still being worked on? Makers of cid proxy claims he's cracked the encryption and will be releasing it in the near future...half a month ago! I personally believe he is about to release Bannana SPlit II, but the Item lock thing messed him up. Anyways, I just had to ask, it'd probably be easier on the rest of us if u explained the situation rather than just banning us on sight, because face it, we've got u totally out numbered.

[CupCakeSlayer]

uhm the only people being banned on sight are those asking for updated sv in request section.


In every other thread people are just receiving warnings.


But rather then have the request section flooded with people asking for SV I made it so if they do they are out of here.


Anyways as it stands i've started work on cracking SV. I'm not entirely sure how it was done before by i'm trying a different approach i'm sure.


But I JUST started about an hour ago looking over it.

Honestly it doesn't appear much has changed.


My problem is When I decompile I miss part of the code due to a delay-load dependency module


Which means i'm missing probably 20 pct of the code. Which could be the diffence between me forcing it to skip over the login page.


The way I'm going about it is to make it completely SKIP the login page. Everything else is handled on your computer. it's a matter of gaining access without a password.


So the sooner I can figure out which part of the code goes where the quicker i can solve this.

The way it was done before i'm assuming was the packets were decrypted and intercepted, Then sent back without every hitting the server to check them. The packet says good to go, you're let in.

But honestly I don't know how it was done before. I didn't care to look in to it because it worked. haha


But If the way I'm doing it works then I should be able to repeat it every time. Assuming they don't completely change the form names/addresses

Because honestly I'm looking at the code at a near assembly level. Which means they'd have to completely change a lot in order for it to look much different.


But as it stands i'm not sure who else is working on a crack suti may be, he might not.


We'll see


But until then we don't need everyone and their step brother spamming the forms asking where it is, and when it will be out. because we don't know.

It could takes hours it could take months.

No one working on it is super experienced in cracking.


Is that enough information for you?

[Ashley]

sticky this so every single noob his brother mother and father can see this, so people will stop spamming and spamming about when it will be cracked, they dont under stand people have lives outside of conquer, maby conquer is there life, but im sure that most programers woking on this bot have school or collage, or a life to tend to , i wish they would just cut out the winging, it really getting me pissed
and googleit take as long as u need, there no rush that it needs to be done this second this minute >.<

[HolySword]

#Topic moved to its related section ( AutoLevel bots section )

[chiefcharlie]

itil be nice once sv is cracked again

[CupCakeSlayer]

And there i am on the verge of cracking it, having to stoop to the packet editing level.


And i notice something..


I'm working on the last version of it..

dammit..

back to the drawing board. hahahahaha how stupid of me.

[Shirozakii]

Originally Posted by GoogleIt

And there i am on the verge of cracking it, having to stoop to the packet editing level.


And i notice something..


I'm working on the last version of it..

dammit..

back to the drawing board. hahahahaha how stupid of me.

LOL! That's gotta suck.

[clarkkenth2005]

Nice Googliet i though ur stupid lol but im wrong I apologize for the words i said u b4 just continue what ur doing i dont care how long it takes... i just want you to know that no matter what happen i still here for you xD. GOOD LUCK

[CupCakeSlayer]

Ok as of now i've hit a wall

the hashing technique they use is one of the best out currently.

while there is a flaw, causing the hash to duplicate itself on a different string making the string also work.

It doesn't necessarily mean i can find it.


BUT they have also mixed the md5 hash with salt

This salt adds random digits to the string basically before the hash

And without a crack of the salt it makes cracking the hash even more challenging.


So it's more a battle of figuring out their salt, then using it to help with my "rainbow table" to find the proper string or a colliding string.


o.O So to put it lightly.

this may take a while.


As it stands i'm attempting to get an account in hopes that I can compare the two hashes to find the similarities so that I can hopefully determine what the salt is for this whole output.

o.O

Sounds just about as complicated as it truly is.

Basically the string to decrypt it is encrypted to the max.